redaktion granariaROAR – Resa On Abroad Roads
A castle and its many stories – the best are those the Tourist Brochure Does Not Tell You.
Imagine a beautiful place: an old castle surrounded by a romantic park where horses graze on rich pastures. Lovingly restored buildings house a cozy hotel and a restaurant, well-kept gardens invite you to walk and a cheerful conversation sounds in the courtyard. This is Galiny Castle today – a lively place.
It is precisely this shining castle that contains a long and adventurous history full of secrets, dark times and those of a miraculous salvation! Especially the part of the resurrection is the most interesting one and should be taken with a closer look. We tell about the conversion of Pałac Galiny, a former Prussian aristocratic estate in present-day Poland, from a centuries-old Junker manor into a luxury hotel and equestrian center. This transformation serves as a fascinating case study in the commodification of complex historiographies for heritage tourism [1]. We trace the estate’s history from a 500-year tenure with the von Eulenburg family through a period of socialist “re-purpose,” and then its current status as a bourgeois getaway that reflects a careful restoration. We go into the sanitization of this history, focusing on three primary ironies: 1) honoring the aristocratic past while ignoring a feudal reality, 2) the erasure of indigenous Masurian identity while marketing “authenticity” in local cultures, and 3) replacing one elite with another while marketing the estate as a historical preservation. Estates like this, while achieving aesthetic success and acting as destinations for the bourgeoise, do not serve as sites for true historical continuity but rather as monuments to historical rupture that curate a past that is consumable and forgets history through trauma from war, ethnic cleansing, and ideological conflict as they mark the twentieth-century legacy of this region [2].
1. Introduction
In the rolling, lake-strewn landscape of what was once East Prussia and is now Poland’s Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship is Pałac Galiny. Adorned with Renaissance architecture in a picturesque setting, a gourmet restaurant in a granary, and world-class equestrian stables, Pałac Galiny offers a scene of bucolic perfection. The tourist brochure describes our experience as a journey into the aristocratic past filled with rustic charm and natural beauty. The modern bourgeoise rents a piece of history while consuming “ecological produce” in the 16th-century manor house before retiring to rooms elegantly outfitted with both a sense of history and contemporary comforts. This is where the new Europe has emerged; a place where the ruptures of the twentieth century have been scarred over so well, it can be marketed as character.
This idyllic presentation, however, only serves to introduce an era of curated amnesia. The ground on which we wade in tranquility is far more complicated, discordant, layered with histories that exceed what we as consumers experienced. Just before it became a place of weekend getaways, the estate served a Junker dynasty, as the seat of the von Eulenberg family for roughly half a millennium. It was positioned as power as a marker of the Prussian aristocratic, in a system of feudal privilege based on agriculture. That past did not seamlessly transition to the present; it felt reparative only by violence in 1945, when the estate fell into the Red Army’s path during the “wild expulsions” that reconfigured the map of East Prussia, partitioned and cleared of nearly all German inhabitants [3]. The romanticized narrative of the restoration deftly leaves this cataclysm out of the historical timeline and pays very little attention to the following decades of socialist neglect, when the aristocratic manor house was re-purposed in utilitarian, anti-aristocratic designs.
We analyse the curious instance of Pałac Galiny not as just a tale of architectural revival, but rather an emblem of the process of history becoming the product (its packaging and sale) in post-communist Europe. We examine the venerable irony of resurrecting and repackaging a site of conflict and displacement as a consumable product in the form of leisure and luxury. The argument is that the commercial viability of such heritage sites is fundamentally reliant on a mechanism of historical sanitisation—a deliberate forgetting of the messy realities of history, to produce a more consumable, and hence marketable, narrative [1].
(c) RESA 10.2025
First, we are bustering the “ghosts of Prussia” by exploring the Eulenburg legacy from centuries of rule to the grim end in 1945, and the ideological reversal of the socialist era. This contextualises the precisely-timed, fortuitous gap of rupture that the contemporary hotel installation tries to bridge, or at least mask by presenting the narrative of continuity. Second, some thoughts to the “Masurian Dilemma,” the tragic end to the indigenous, Polish-speaking protestant remnant in the region. The Masurians, who were caught between German and Polish nationalisms, have largely disappeared from the official record, their culture erased as their religious and cultural heritage was subsumed into the triumphant Catholicism of post-war Poland [4]. That the Masurians are all but erased from content held up as “local culture” by sites like Galiny is oddly reminscent of the commercial, and historical, erasure in the contemporary case.
We address the processes of historical commodification itself. Imagine how the physical restoration of the palace—e.g. by converting the granary to a gourmet restaurant—is paralleled by a narrative restoration of elite pursuits, like horsemanship, as untethered, apolitical choices of lifestyle. This section will raise the question of what the tourist brochure doesn’t tell you, and how the commercial practice itself exactly hinges on selective curation. Lastly, with a critical disposition, reflect on the ramifications of this case. That Galiny is not a nod to continuity, but more representatively rupture—a memorial to the “inevitable hangover” of a wild historic party [5]. In a post-Merkel Europe, with an ongoing evolution of the German-Polish relationship and new geopolitical tensions, sites like Galiny are complex barometers of how nations negotiate memory, forgetting, and exploitation (via commerce) of both contested, and shared histories. The work will reveal, in multiple ways, the ideological undertones of heritage tourism and what is ultimately questioned by positive, “authentic” experiences.
In the EU-context, an integrated approach to the management of cultural heritage is increasingly important. This understanding follows brave the UNESCO World Heritage Convention of 1972, breaks with the traditional separation of culture and nature and instead considers them as an inseparable units, a “combined works of man and nature”. Its a recognition that buildings and the surrounding landscapes should! shape and define each other. The long-term preservation of such complex ensembles therefore requires a holistic – what a wording- strategy, meaning monument protection goes hand in hand with ecological restoration and sustainable use. So far so good!
Galiny (formerly Gallingen) in the Polish voivodeship of Ermland-Masura is an exemplary case. The transformation from a dilapidated ruin to a thriving, multifunctional property, follows best practices of professional monument conservation, cultural heritage management and tourism planning. These often perceived as contradictory goals were profitably combined. To fully understand the basics of a revitalization project, a detailed look at the historical and architectural development is essential. But mind the gap: the whole thing is a painful thing.
2. Historical and architectural development until 1945, And the Ghosts of Prussia
In learning a site like Pałac Galiny—or Schloss Gallingen as it was known for most of its history—one must first master the tactic of selective amnesia. History, especially in this part of Europe, is not a timeline but a shredded fabric that has been hastily stitched together with an assortment of new ideologies and national narratives. The current pastoral presentation of Galiny, with assumed heritage tourism, is a textbook case on this practice. Guests are invited to enjoy a Renaissance setting while the much less enjoyable ghost that lurks beneath each stone—the half millennium of Prussian Junker ownership—as signified by the land’s long-time occupiers and masters, the zu Eulenburg family.
This section is a form of historical archaeology, a way to dig into the restored plaster and barefooted hardwood flooring to deconstruct the cherry-picked myth about the Eulenburgs as benevolent owners of an noble residence located in a timeless land, was actually a landholder and beneficiary of an rigid, antebellum-type, albeit fragile, system. We will outline their 500-year existence, reveal the 1945 apocalypse and the curse of vaporizing their world with a new and youthful spirit, entertain a tale of a socialist summer camp of the manor, and see if it is possible to keep the moral of the story intact. This is not just a story about one family or singular palace; it is about how a planetary order, that seemed unassailable could be turned to ruin and turn sanctions to ghosts, to ruin, and eventually a five-star hotel with suitable equine facilities. The ugliness of the Eulenburg legacy, while not totally evident in the architecture, is persistent in the dirt; including sanitizing through rustic-chic renovations.
2.1 The Manor and the Masters: 500 Years of Prussian Domination
The story of Gallingen begins—as so many stories of Prussian ambition do—with a man named Botho. Not the 19th century Prussian Minister President Botho zu Eulenburg, whose machinations were little more than an endnote in the larger German story, but an primary ancestor [6]. In the 16th century, Botho zu Eulenburg laid the first stones of what would become the family’s East Prussian anchor for the next five centuries. The structure was as called a palace because it wasn’t a palace, it was more of a defensive statement, or fortified manor, intended to show power and secure land in a country still raw from the Teutonic Knight’s conquests. It was a physical emblem of my Junker creed: land is power, power is a patriarchal birthright.
For the better part of the next half millennium, the Eulenburgs were, not just residents, but were the central nervous system of the surrounding territory, such that they represented Prussia in miniature. Their lives played out through the expanding walls of the manor in similar sequence to the trajectory of the state in which they served. From a local power, they became a power in a German Empire. They were diplomats, officers, and administrators, tightly bound by the Hohenzollern court in Berlin and Königsberg. The palace at Gallingen was their power base. The agricultural wealth that funded their careers and funding their aristocratic lifestyles originated at Gallingen. It was a monument to Godly ordained, or socially bestowed, hierarchy. The Eulenburgs ruled, and the local people—a mixture of German settlers and Polish speaking Masurians—served.
This was not a romantic, paternalistic stewardship, as heritage pamphlets might love to suggest in their unsuspecting subtlety. This was a feudal relationship, modernized over centuries but in in essence, not that different in terms of power. The manor house with its increasingly grandiose gables and growing wings was the heart of it all. From there harvests were organized, rents were collected, and justice (the lord’s justice) was given. The land surrounding the manor house was not a picturesque landscape one looked at from a hotel terrace, but a site of production: a complex of fields, forests and villages that existed to maintain the family’s place in the local hierarchy. The timings of life were dictated by economic and social imperatives as much as by the seasons.
The Eulenburgs were capable of adapting to the vagaries of fate struck by the Thirty Years War, the Napoleonic invasions and even the tumult of 19th century politics. They transitioned their fortified house into a Renaissance palace and later a country estate; each renovation of their structure a further testament to their stable and advancing position within the Prussian elite. They epitomize the Junker class: conservative, militaristic, loyal to the crown and cynical of the liberal, democratic sea currently flooding Europe. From the safe distance of their manor the world was static, their place in it upheld by centuries of historical precedent. What a magnificent, sustained and impossible illusion!
Understanding the complex history of a cultural heritage is the strategic basis for its authentic preservation and sustainable use. Every architectural era, every change in use and every historical break leaves traces that shape the character of a place. In the case of Galiny Castle, this historical depth is particularly pronounced and ranges from a defensive Renaissance complex to a large-scale agricultural and forestry company.
2.1.1 A little bit about the Architecture
The foundation of Galiny Castle in 1589 by Freiherr Botho zu Eulenburg marks the emergence of one of the few surviving examples of Renaissance architecture in the former Duchy of Prussia. Built on a hill, the facility originally fulfilled a clear defensive function. It was surrounded by a moat fed by the damed river, and the only access was via a drawbridge. An underground escape route that led under the riverbed to the nearby church and ended under the altar underlines the defensive character of the original conception. The two-storey main building with an attic formed the oldest part of the complex. To ward off attackers, the castle was equipped with clever defenses:
- A deep moat: Imagine the castle was like an island. A deep ditch was dug around it and filled with water from a specially dammed river. So no enemy could just get to the walls.
- A drawbridge: The only way inside was over a massive drawbridge. If danger threatened, this bridge could simply be pulled up, and the path was blocked.
- A secret escape route: For the worst case, there was a secret escape route. An underground passage led from the castle under the riverbed to the nearby church. The exit was right under the altar – a perfect hiding place and a safe way to freedom. Nowadays, unfortunately, there is no trace of it anymore.
Over the time, the property has been continuously expanded and adapted to the respective needs and stylistic preferences. These chronological changes reflect the development from a pure weir to a representative agricultural center:
- 18. Century: With the addition of the striking two-story half-timbered storage in 1745 as well as the expansion to horse stables and a carriage stable, the agricultural and representative function of the estate was strengthened. A huge half-timbered storage was built directly in front of the gate. In this large warehouse, supplies and crops could be stored safely.
- Middle of the 18th Century: The moat was filled. This was because there was peace in the region and defense was no longer so important. The nobles now wanted magnificent and comfortable houses that showed their wealth. Instead of digging, magnificent horse stables and a coach stable were built. The castle was no longer a theater of war, but the center of a stately estate.
- 19th Century: The complex underwent a comprehensive transformation in the neo-Gothic style. During this time, the moat was also filled up and the course of the river was brought into a form that is very close to today’s course. The buildings received ornaments in the then very modern neo-Gothic style. Two new towers were also added to give the castle an even more magnificent appearance.
- At the turn of the 19th to the 20th Century: The Galiny estate had grown enormously. With an area of 1260 hectares – that’s as big as about 1765 football fields – it was one of the largest and most important country estates in the entire region.
- 20th Century: In 1921, under the direction of the Silesian architect Graf Hochberg, the neo-Gothic decorations were removed again. This measure gave the palace its present, simpler and clearer appearance.
At the turn of the 19th to the 20th In the 19th century, the estate had developed into an important agricultural majorate. The data from the beginning of 1945 illustrate the complexity of the operation as an agricultural-industrial company:
- Total area of 1,275 hectares, of which 580 ha of arable land, 40 ha meadows, 141 ha of pastures and 420 ha of forest.
- Comprehensive farm with Herdbuch cattle breeding (e.g. 108 horses, 340 cattle and 212 pigs in 1932).
- Additional commercial facilities, including a steam sawing and planing plant as well as a commercial nursery with cactus breeding.
However, this status as an important economic center found an expected end with communism from 1945 on, which initiated a long phase of decay.
2.2 The Great Rupture of 1945: Deportation, Plunder, and an almost Ironic Justice
For 500 years the Eulenburg family at Gallingen had experienced history as an unbroken line of progression of their family history. And then came 1945. Not a chapter in history, but an apocalypse. The swift and brutal march of the Red Army in East Prussia did not just mark the end of a war, it snuffed out a civilization. The Junker world, with its deep hierarchies and centuries of certainty was not defeated or foredoomed, it was executed. “The Great Rupture” is a term for this period marked by the unfurling of a cataclysm that vaporized the entire foundation of Prussian aristocratic life in a windstorm of violence, revenge, and ideology.
As the Eastern Front collapsed the lords of Gallingen became just refugees, indistinguishable from the peasants and townspeople they once lorded over, all escaping the rush to the west. The stories from this period are grim and legion. Families that once commanded armies and advised kings were scattering and disintegrating. For the Eulenburgs specifically, the reckoning was particulary brutal. Wanda, Countess zu Eulenburg, and her husband were shot in the last, chaotic weeks of the war, a final testament to the personal cost of the regime that they, mostly, wholeheartedly supported. [7] The last owner of the estate was reputedly killed in a Siberian camp; an eminently unceremonious end for a bonafide Prussian nobleman – another Old Order member salted in the Earth, a sort of poetic justice. It was indeed a reckoning, on a biblical scale.
In the immediate aftermath of the fighting, the palace itself suffered the fate of all the regime’s symbols. It was a prize of war first for the soldiers, and then for the new Polish government. There is no term that quite captures the sheer magnitude of the systematic ripping down of the went into the newly acquired territories – in plundering there’s an idea of simple theft. In the case of the Eulenburgs, furniture and art, books and architectural elements (anything of value that could be carried away) were taken. This was not simply looting Epistemically it was in some ways symbolic erasure. Every candelabra ripped from the wall or ripped out fireplace mantle, symbolically sealed the fate of German East Prussia. The once grand house was a hollow shell, the splendor of aristocracy reduced wholly to an unfeeling apparition.
One could be tempted to call this a tragedy, and on a human level it was, but from a larger historical perspective, it had an unmistakable flavor of a grim, poetic justice. The Junkers, of which the Eulenburgs were prototypical, had been the foundation of Prussian militarism. They supported the kind of aggressive, expansionism and social hierarchy that contributed to the terrors of Hitler’s Third Reich. They built their power on a system of hegemony, and when hegemony is turned against those who invented it, it is terrifyingly efficient. The ideology that provided the base of their power–absolutism–set the framework for ruin. The cruelties that removed the Eulenburgs from their 500-year reign at Gallingen was direct and violent consequence of a world they helped create. The rupture was complete, offered no comforting continuity, had only ghosts and eventually ironic possibilities of commercial revival. The system they represented, created for permanence, had shown to be nothing less than spectacularly mortal.
2.3 From Aristocratic Splendor to Socialist Summer Camp
When the storm of 1945 had passed, leaving behind the detritus of war and population revolution, the question of what to do with the remains of the former masters surfaced. What does one do with a Prussian palace in a Polish People’s Republic? The answer was nothing short of a masterstroke of ideological repurposing, a perfect embodiment of the values of the new socialist regime. Pałac Galiny was turned into a state-run children’s summer camp, formerly the exclusive purview of an aristocratic dynasty – the zu Eulenburgs.
This conversion was more than simply a practical solution for a vacant, cavernous building. It was a strong statement politically. The very halls where Junkers evoked grandiose plans for military careers and managed their feudal estates now echoed with the laughter and songs of the children of the proletariat. The ballroom, undoubtedly a venue for uniformed aristocrats toasting the Kaiser, was most probably converted into the dining hall and rainy-day activity room. The manicured parks where ladies and gentlemen strolled were now playgrounds. It was a direct, almost theatrical desecration of spaces once exalted. The ultimate emblem of aristocratic privilege was socialized, the exclusivity shattered and grandeur appropriated for the collective.
For many decades, Galiny was mired in this ideological state of suspended animation. Although the conversion preserved the palace from the complete destruction many such estates faced, it subjected it to a slow, calamitous decay. The state-run system of a children’s camp was historically unremarkable – it would not prioritize even the lowest standards of preservation for Renaissance stucco or Baroque detail. Maintenance was practical at best. Leaky roofs would be patched with tar, period ornamentation painted with enamel from the local industrial painter, parquet flooring under durable linoleum. This was not preservation – this was habitation. The palace was not a historical monument to characterize, it was a part of a functional social infrastructure, like a school or public pool.
This period of socialist custodianship is often characterized as one of neglect, a sad interlude between the palace’s aristocratic glory and its current capitalist renaissance. However, that perspective does not capture the delicious irony of the moment. The socialist state was far more authentic steward of the Eulenburg legacy than any luxury hotel could be. The palace was not treated like a romantic relic to be fetishized, but rather as a pillaged symbol of an enemy that had been vanquished. Its systematic disfigurement was a continuous institutionalized act of revenge: a quiet, ongoing proclamation that the Junker world was not only dead, but also meaningless. The peeling paint and drafty windows were not simply the effects of economic hardship; they symbolized an active de-consecrateion. The aristocratic ghost was being exorcised through the banal, cheerful, and slow corrosive presence of children on holiday. This was not the glamorous ruin of a golden age lost; rather, it was the drab, functional afterlife of a defeated ideology.
In post-war Poland, the German heritage was systematically ignored or supplanted in the so-called “reclaimed territories” such as Ermand and Masuria within the framework of a state-sponsored “archaeology of Poland”. This approach, which aimed to highlight exclusively Polish traces in the history of the region, led to the marginalization and physical decline of buildings that were considered testimonies of the Prussian or German past. The fate of the last owner, Count Botho Wend zu Eulenburg, who died during the deportation to Siberia, sealed the end of an era. Although the building fabric of the palace was miraculously preserved, a long phase of misappropriation and decline began. After a short use for holiday camps for children, the property was taken over by the Polish state. In the following decades, the palace and the surrounding park visibly fell into disrepair. The once well-maintained park went wild, trees fell and rotted, and the entire site became a “waste dump”. This desolate starting point in 1996, when the current owners bought the property, was the immense challenge.
3. The Masurian Dilemma: A Landscape of Erased Identities
To understand the painstakingly manufactured tranquility of a space such as Pałac Galiny, we must first understand the deep silence that preceded it. The rolling hills and placid lakes of Masuria are not a pristine, untrammeled landscape. Rather they are a historical palimpsest, a territory whose prior identities have been scrubbed clean so that a beautiful emptiness can be offered to new identity making. The transition from a Prussian Junker manor to a Polish luxury hotel did not occur in a vacuum. It was made possible due to one of the most violent and thorough demographic transformations of the twentieth century. This section investigates the uncomfortable truths that underpin the region’s beautiful present: the violent removal of a German population, the tragic absorption of the indigenous Masurians, and the religious reprogramming of a land that was once a bastion of Protestantism. This is the tale of what must have been forgotten for the modern Masurian idyll to be born.
3.1 The “Wild Expulsions” and the Sanitized Terminology of Displacement
History, much like luxury tourism, also loves a euphemism. The violent, chaotic, and frequently murderous process of ridding a territory of its people is a messy business, not well suited to the tidy timelines of textbooks or the serene marketing of a holiday destination. As the Red Army advanced toward the end of World War II, and as the borders of Poland shifted westward, the German population of East Prussia experienced a cataclysm. Events have been wrapped in a vocabulary of bureaucratic neutrality: population transfer, resettlement, or expansion, or the slightly more honest term “expulsion” [8]. These terms do not effectively describe the events that historians now recognize as one of the largest examples of ethnic cleansing in history [9].
The process began well before any international agreements were signed at Potsdam. Beginning in January 1945, as Soviet and Polish military forces subdued the territories east of the Oder-Neisse line, a series of spontaneous events came to be known as what have been termed “wild expulsions” [10]. This was not an organized operation, but a spontaneous eruption of vengeance, opportunism, and nationalist fervor. German civilians who had not fled the advancing front could not avoid the atrocities raining down upon them: plunder, violence, the summary deportation of non-combatants from their homes, and forced marches in frigid winter conditions or packed into cattle cars. It is estimated that 700,000 – 800,000 Germans were forcibly removed from these territories in this first chaotic stage. Furthermore, many German civilians become conscripts in forced “reparation labor,” ending up in the Soviet Union, many of whom did not return [10].
By the time the Allied powers met at Potsdam to officially authorize the “orderly and humane” transfer of German populations, a more sordid reality had already been established on the ground. The communiques issued as a result of the meeting gave legitimacy to a process that was anything but orderly and humane. The clean language of international diplomacy obscured the ugly realities of dispossession. The word “transfer” suggests something orderly – an act of administrative bookkeeping to simply move someone from one column to another. It obscures the state-sponsored violence and starvation and simply terror that was experienced by millions. The linguistic denature of a historical trauma is a necessary step toward the reinvention of the region. A “transfer” of a specific population is an abstraction of a historical event; an ethnic cleansing campaign is a crime against humanity, and leaves ghosts behind. Ghosts are not good for business, as any hotelier will tell you. The pastoral landscape that today’s tourist enjoys is based on these sanitary terms that are nice to ignore while enjoying a cup of coffee on the patio without considering the screams that echoed through the forests.
3.2 Forgetting the Masurians: The Tragedy of a People Between Nations
If the Germans, as losers of the war, encountered a clearly defined future of defeat and removal, the Masurians comprise a more complex and tragic story of cultural dissolution. The Masurians were a distinctive ethnographic group, Slavic in origin with a unique dialect of Polish, yet largely Lutheran in faith and subjects of the Prussian state, and subsequently the German state, for centuries [4]. The group occupied a liminal space, caught between the tectonic plates of nationalism in both Germany and Poland. They were Poles that prayed like Germans, Germans that spoke like Poles – an identity hybrid that succumbed under the violent purity tests of national identity in the mid-20th century.
Their historical loyalty was clear. During the 1920 East Prussian plebiscite to determine whether it would join Polish or remain with Germany, the Masurians voted in favor of remaining with East Prussia in great numbers. In the Allenstein district, which largely comprised Masuria, a staggering 99.32% of ballots were cast for Germany, [4] which has very little to do with German ethnic identity, and almost entirely related to their rooted suspicions regarding Polish nationalism, and importantly, the predominately Catholic Polish state. Their culture and identity were based on their Protestant faith, which distinguished them from their Catholic Polish neighbors.
This loyalty offered them no protection in 1945. The Red Army made no distinctions between their German and Masurian loyalty, suffering the same brutalities in the initial invasion [2]. Afterward, the new Polish adminstration faced a decision. The Masurians spoke Slavic, and therefore according to nationalist logics, were considered “autochthonous” Poles who could be “re-Polonized.” They were a native population brought along to save face, an important demographic justification for the Polish state to claim the territory through the 1945 territory that became delineated in 1945. In 1945, Polish authorities classified approximately 80,000 of these “autochthons,” which by 1950 had become more than 111,000 through a process of “verification” [2].
This was a process of forced assimilation. The Masurian dialect was repressed, their Protestant faith was marginalized, and their cultural institutions were destroyed. They were viewed with suspicion by the new Polish settlers, who were mostly Catholics from eastern territories annexed by the Soviet Union, and who regarded them as Germanized traitors. The Masurians felt displaced from a state that sought to erase their unique identity. In this impossible position, almost all Masurians eventually “chose” to emigrate to West Germany in the decades after the war, even joining the very people who had ruled over them.
By 1950, the newly arrived Polish population outnumbered the native Masurians by six times or more [2]. Today, the Masurian people and culture have almost completely disappeared from the landscape that bears their name. Their legacy is like a phantom limb, irrevocably ached in regional history. The “vibrant local traditions” marketed to tourists are often staged reconstructions or inventions of the settlers who came after the war. The real Masurians, a people who had successfully negotiated an identity of a borderland for centuries, ended up being consumed by the nation-states they sought to distance themselves from. Their demise is the last act of erasure: a blotting out of their history in order to create a blank slate on which a new, simplified, marketable Polish identity could be cultivated.
3.3 The Triumph of Catholicism: The Excision of a Protestant Past
The most visible and enduring legacy of the demography of Masuria reflects its architectural landscape: its churches. Prior to 1945, the red-brick Gothic churches scattered across the Masurian countryside were overwhelmingly Lutheran, their austere interiors sanctified by centuries of Protestant worship [11]. They served as the communal and spiritual heart of both the German population and Masurian culture. They are now nearly all Roman Catholic. The transformation of the region’s sacred spaces is the final and most lasting aspect of its cultural annihilation.
The process was expedient and definitive. As the German and Masurian populations left, their churches were left vacant. The newly arrived Polish settlers, who were almost all Catholic, arrived with their specific clergy, their own faith. And so, the expropriated Protestant churches went unworshipped, and were rarely bestowed with ceremony [4]. Across steeples, rusty weather vanes were unceremoniously replaced by crosses, previously unadorned wooden altars were rewarded with statues of the Virgin Mary, and the German-language inscriptions on gravestones in adjoining cemeteries were entirely erased or abandoned to a slow crumbling anonymity. This was not merely a change in denomination; it was a symbolic and spiritual act of conquest, a re-consecration of an abandonment that echoed the political re-consecration of the land.
This religious transformation was critical to cementing the region’s new Polish identity. In the national consciousness of Poland, to be Polish is, almost by definition, to be Catholic. The Lutheranism of the Masurians was the primary cultural barrier that prevented them from identifying with the Polish state in 1920 [4]. By absorbing their churches by erasing the public presence of Protestantism in Masuria, the new administration effectively erased the most significant marker of the regional otherness that had been made historically. While Warmia had a slightly different situation, where a Polish-speaking Catholic population had long coexisted with Germans, in the Protestant Masuria, it was absolute [12].
The outcome is a scale of significant historic dissonance. A tourist visiting a village church today may admire the Teutonic Gothic architecture of the church, while the religious and cultural situation is completely inverted. In fact, the building is an artifact of a defeated German and Masurian world, while the liturgy and worshiping community that replaces it embodies the victory of Polish Catholicism. This religious appropriation was also part of the broader loss of regional cultural identity, a historic reality documented by investigators looking at the transformation of both Warmia and Masuria since 1945 [13]. The victory of Catholicism was the final stamp on this new regime of existence; it guaranteed that the very soul of the land would be completely reprogrammed. It also created a comfortable and durable religious ecology that papered over the theological cracks of the past, making the region legible and familiar to the new Polish nation. The old Protestant hymnbooks were silenced and the Masurian dialect disappeared from the pews, but they are as much a part of Galiny’s foundation as the stones that were laid in its cellar.
4. The restoration project from 1996. A Commodification of History as a Sanitized Past called ‘Holistic revitalization’
“The strategic decision of the new owners to acquire the ruinous property in 1996 is a prime example of a private initiative to save a nationally important monument. Instead of focusing only on the building fabric, they pursued a holistic approach from the beginning, which appreciated the inseparable connection of cultural and natural heritage and went far beyond the pure renovation.” This could be the entry of a tourist brochure...
The transition of Pałac Galiny from a remnant of Prussian aristocracy to a world-renowned tourist attraction is an illustration of the market logic of contemporary heritage management. In this understanding, history ceases to be a recording of events—an often messy and brutal contest of power, dispossession, and ideology— and becomes curated, refined, and repackaged for the consumer. The scholarly term for transforming historical legacies into experiences with a brand is the commodification of cultural heritage [1]. In this instance, all inconvenient truths about conquest, serfdom, and ethnic (re-)displacement have been erased and replaced with a charming and consumable story. In this sense, history is not history as it was, but as it sells—a romanticized retelling of the past specifically designed for the aesthetic and emotional expectations of a privileged consumer. The restoration of Galiny, while architecturally brilliant, serves dual purposes: to preserve the architecture and to filter the narrative so that the end product is one of leisure and respite, rather than uncomfortable contemplation.
4.1 From Granary to Gourmet: The Rustic Chic of Modern Heritage Tourism
The architectural lynchpin of Galiny’s commercial resurrection is the 18th-century granary—a structure that once epitomized the estate’s agricultural prowess and its attendant labor. In a stroke of marketing brilliance, this once useful building has been transformed into the “Gospoda Galiny” (Galiny Inn), an upscale restaurant acclaimed for its refined take of regional cuisine. The transition from a storage of grain to a platform for gastronomy exemplifies a broader trend in heritage tourism: the aestheticization of labor and the romanticization of the rustic. The rough-hewn timber and stone walls, once markers of agricultural function, are now prized for their authenticity, providing a delightful backdrop for diners consuming slow-roasted venison and regionally-sourced accompaniments.
Galiny’s restaurant is a terrific example of how heritage is not simply preserved, but writ large, constructed to meet the expectations of modern consumers. Heritage tourism is thus not simply or merely pleasurable, but can be commodified to meet consumer expectations. The “rustic chic” aesthetic efforts to detach the visual signs of agrarian life from the real agrarian life as it was lived. Guests can continue in savoring the idea of a simpler life on the land, without any of the discomfort of such a life. The menu, contains ingredients derived from the estate’s ecological gardens, obscures the costs of continuity with a notion of wholesome, indefinable, and timeless tradition. This entire experience, however, is created—a social drama. The history is reconfigured into a sensory commodity, and the past is not to remember for its complexity, but to taste, witness, savour, and/or enjoy. The granary’s conversion is an act of recognized design re-contextualization; the labour and sweat of the Masurian peasant has now been transmuted into ambiance for the bourgeois consumer. This commodification of heritage is part of the “heritage industry”, which relies on semantic vapour to exploit the intangible of history and traditions values—values which we could theoretically agree have no market price—and packaged as the centre of a commercial brand [1]. Like the granary, the history of agrarian labour at Galiny does not dispense wheat, but stores a highly curated and well marketed fantasy of the past.
4.2 Taming the Beast: Equestrian Excellence as a Modern Aristocratic Pursuit
Along with the culinary appeal of the restored granary, there is the large equestrian center, which has positioned the estate as a premiere destination for horse enthusiasts. Boasting over 100 horses, modern stables, and extensive riding trails, the equestrian center is a privilege enjoyed by models of professionalism. The marketing narrative eventually ties this modern undertaking to the “lasting traditions” of the land, which evokes imagines of Prussian Junkers surveying their domains from horseback. This connection is more atmospheric than historically accurate; while horses were important to the workings of any large agricultural estate, the contemporary, sport-based idea of equestrianism, or horse culture, associated with Galiny is more of a modern leisure activity and past-time of the new elite, rather than a continuation of an aristocratic necessity.
The performance of equestrianism on the estate is ultimately used as a tool for commodification, or another way of having the guests purchase an experience of aristocratic life. Even simply riding a nice groomed warmblood on the manicured parklands allows a contemporary visitor to enter a fantasy, to perform a part in a historical drama of their imagination. This is a physical reenactment of the romanticized narrative of Junker life– which does not mention the rigid class hierarchy and quasi-feudal agricultural labor relations of real aristocratic life. The horse, once a tool of agricultural production and military might, is “tamed” and assumed the role of an accessory of leisure. This curated experience provides the leisure of historical continuity while ultimately speaking to the values and goals of its customers. Thus the “authenticity” it offers is quickly demonstrated as a constructed one, meant to generate a feeling rather than provide a historical reality. Such constructions are a common aspect of heritage tourism, in which promotional materials create and resolve contradicted discourses in which the consumer is clearly not made to think too critically [1]. . .the equestrianism at Galiny has an aura of surrounding historical normalization that perfectly grounds the wild beast of history to a groomed mount for a discerning guest.
4.3 Curating the Narrative: What the Tourist Brochure Does Not Tell You
The overall success of Pałac Galiny, as a commercial establishment, is predicated upon its ability to control the historical narrative. The official narrative presented in marketing brochures, in combination with its website and curated guest experience, is a careful exercise in omission. Instead, the official presentation emphasizes the Renaissance architecture of the estate, the 500 years legacy of the Eulenburg family, the painstaking restoration process, and modern amenities that were previously absent. This narrative is one of continuity, beauty, and resilience. This is not a historical narrative for educational purposes and comprehension. What are we not hearing, or missing is just as important substantively as what is being enjoyed. This selective historical narrative is an essential component of how heritage is made into a commodity in tourism, their was an “official image” that is assembled for consumption, which was best suited for a national ideology or, in this case, market [1].
There is no mention of Eulenburg’s last Count, Botho Wend zu Eulenburg, who inherited the estate in 1941, only to be deported by the Soviets in 1945 and who died in a gulag in Siberia. If we left the seminar here, it would certainly ruin the romance of the aristocratic story, specifically, the last Count’s nobility and aristocratic splendor. And the similar complex tragic, ambition routing journey of the Masurians, caught in the middle of either German and Polish identity, that have largely been displaced or completely assimilated by the war; could hardly be included in any of the generic presentations of “regional traditions”. There is another strange moment that is not prescriptive of the heir family history as a whole, and is used simply as a narrative of socialist administration as a moment of negligent dormancy, which was simply the culmination of historical and commodified narratives that have been developed into another glorious rebursement of capitalism, than for an ideologically distinguishable era in of itself.
This well-edited history is not untrue; it is a deep misrepresentation through emphasis. It glosses over the past by removing its aesthetically valuable parts from their often brutal history. The palace is introduced as a timeless artifact that has serenely weathered the historical storms, while in fact it is a product of that storm. The narrative that is sold to the visitor is one of harmonious continuity – where Prussian manor becomes a piece of Polish national history becomes a global luxury escape. The ruptures, the violence, the ideological conflicts, are smoothed out to allow for a polished surface for the modern tourist to project their desires for escape and romance. It becomes a historical theme park for the bourgeoisie, the ghosts of the past are politely asked to be quiet so as to allow the guests to have their peace, and not be disturbed by others who paid to be there.
Of course the restoration of the palace and the outbuildings was a mammoth task for years. The owners were faced with a ruinous state: the roof of the palace was in danger of collapse and probably would not have survived the next winter. During the basic renovation, serious design errors also came into light, which required innovative solutions. The years of renovation and conversion of the buildings aimed to secure the historical substance and at the same time prepare it for the new, modern times. The devastated park, which was used as a garbage dump, was completely redesigned. A special achievement was the excavation of the old ponds, whose original location was found “after old traces”. In addition, the river’s weirs and reservoirs have been rebuilt to restore the estate’s historic water regime and restore the park to its original character. The well-maintained parts of the park were then replanted. Even the river that once filled the ditch was revived. The old weirs and dams were rebuilt to restore the water landscape of the past. Oh, if the river Pisa could only talk to us!
(c) RESA 10.2025
5. Today’s use after a wild party in history
The long-term preservation of cultural heritage depends decisively on its economic viability. A static museum concept cannot be financed for many facilities of this size and complexity. Galiny’s current business model is therefore a successful symbiosis of monument protection, respectful modernization and market-oriented use. It not only secures the financing of maintenance, but also enlivens the historical ensemble and makes it accessible to the general public. Today, a pension and a restaurant are housed in the historic half-timbered storage from 1745 with its striking clock tower. In addition, guests can also dine in the atmospheric old forge, which impressively illustrates the principle of adaptive reuse. The restored stables from the 18th Century are home to a stud farm, a riding club and a riding school. This use is linked to the historical significance of the property and attracts a specific target group. The fields of the estate continue to be actively cultivated in agriculture, which continues the historical function as a farm and contributes to economic diversification. Natural leisure activities such as horseback riding, cycling, hiking and fishing are self-evident. A traditional Russian banja (sauna) expands the wellness offer and appeals to the stressed guests from the business world.
The recognition is reflected in numerous awards, including from the Polish Tourism Organization, the Trip Advisor Traveller Choice 2020, a recommendation in the Gault & Millau Poland 2020 and the Booking.com Traveller Review Award 2021. Further honors such as “Best Product and Service of Ermand and Masuria”, “Product of Ermland-Masuria”, “Family-Friendly Hotel” and the certification as “Bicycle-Friendly Place” on the Green Velo Trail confirm the high quality of the offer.
Galiny Castle teaches us two important things:
- Ancient buildings are history books. They tell us about the lives, dreams and challenges of people in the past.
- Decay: Even the strongest walls can disintegrate if you don’t take care of them. Oblivion is the greatest enemy. Not only of cultural heritage.
5.1. The Hangover
Europe, and particularly its central and eastern corridors have been on a historical bender for roughly a century. This was a party that started with the destructive mix of Prussian militarism, Nazi megalomania and Soviet utopia, then excitedly chased with liberal democracy and free-market capitalism. Like any truly wild night out, which ended with borders redrawn like it was graffiti on a wall, the mass removal of entire populations like unruly guests, and the hosts waking up with a hangover and unsure where the patrons last night went, but this was technically their house with someone else’s furniture. Pałac Galiny is the Alka-Seltzer, a peaceful pastoral headache after the loud ideological rave.
The palace at its current state is a hanging testament to the hangover. For now, the labor of restoring the manor house and converting the granary to a high-end restaurant, is contributors to instilling some order and to provide continuity to a narrative that was disrupted violently. Again, it is a process of cleaning up after the historical equivalent of a frat party. The detritus of the 20th century: the expulsion of the Eulenburgs, the exorcising of the German presence, the utilitarian neglect of the socialist period – has all been swept under the manicured lawns and composted in the organic herb garden [3]. The tourist sipping a fine Polish wine on the terrace is effectively celebrating the eerie calm after a cataclysm. The relaxing, timeless experience is conveniently narrated to begin (again) with the exquisitely restored Renaissance-fashioned façade and to end with the dessert menu, wilfully ignoring the unpleasant series of events in between.
This is the great irony of modern heritage tourism in places like former East Prussia: it sells peace by profiting off of war. The emptiness and unspoiled nature that make the Masurian landscape so attractive to stressed urbanites arriving from Warsaw or Berlin are a residue of the demographic void instigated by the “wild expulsions” of 1945. The very inauthenticity of the experience of “authenticity” is based upon a profound inauthenticity of historical representation. It is a hangover cure that works by convincing the patient that the party never occurred, or, if it did, that it was an exceedingly chic affair all along. The modern Polish business owners with good taste and business acumen have not erased history- they have only rebranded it. The ghosts of the Junkers and the displaced Masurians have not been exorcised, but have been employed as unpaid, invisible extras in a costume drama for paying guests.
5.2 A Monument to Rupture, Not Continuity
The marketing narrative of Pałac Galiny, like so many similar European heritage sites, draws heavily on the comfortable notion of continuity. The brochures and websites reference “500 years of history,” “timeless traditions,” and a “legacy expertly restored.” This language evokes a continuous line connecting the sixteenth-century Baron Botho zu Eulenburg to twenty-first-century tourists in the spa. It is a seductive fiction, history’s lullaby for an anxious age. In truth, Galiny is not a monument to continuity, but a monument to rupture. Each brick and beam tells stories of violent disconnection, of ownership severed, of identity erased, and of purpose radically changed.
The first and most profound rupture was in 1945. The year marks not a transition, but an abyss. On one side is half a millennia of German, aristocratic, Protestant entitlement. On the other is the immediate invasion of a Polish, Catholic, and eventually socialist reality. The Eulenburg family members did not flourish as stewards; they were violently dispossesswed, disencumbered of their world, and the last owner died in a Siberian gulag. The palace was not bequeathed; it was plundered, a spoil of war that redrew the European map. The following decades of the Polish People’s Republic has become a second rupture. The conversion from an aristocratic seat of power to a collective farm and a summer camp for children of workers was a consciously ideological act. It was a strategy to obliterate the symbols of the old order and rupture the chain of a feudal legacy. The neglect of the structure in this time was not just based on economic mismanagement, it was passive ideological warfare against the very stones of the building.
The ultimate rupture, paradoxically, is the restoration itself. The post-1989 privatization and conversion to a luxury hotel is not a return to any form of the past; it is the making of something entirely new: the commodification of a fractured history. The present owners are not aristocrats who are extending a noble lineage; they are capitalists, entrepreneurs in the heritage industry, who are expertly repackaging a “cleaned up” version of the past for a new global elite. The equestrian center does not revive the Junker’s cavalry traditions; it serves the modern leisure class. The restaurant in the granary does not feed the estate’s day laborers, it provides gourmet meals to international tourists. Each of the phases in Galiny’s existence—Prussian manor, socialist camp, capitalist resort—exists as a world in itself, separated from the others by an unbridgeable ideological and demographic chasm. To reference “continuity” here requires a misunderstanding of the vicious, episodic flow of 20th century European history. Galiny exists not as a continuous narrative, but a resilient stage upon which entirely different, and mutually exclusive, plays have been performed.
5.3 The Polish-German Question in a Post-Merkel Europe
For a painful amount of time, under the watchful, maternal brow of Angela Merkel, our Polish-German relationship seemed to settle into a nice (if somewhat dull) equilibrium. We acknowledge the ghosts of our past with sober speeches at anniversary events, reparations were a fringe topic, and the shared border was an open conduit for commerce and tourism. Historical theme parks like Pałac Galiny were perfectly at home within this landscape of managed memory. They were arenas in which Germans could return as guilt-free tourists to admire a past their ancestors had built, and Poles could put on display their successful stewardship of that inheritance, as evidence of their resilience and European bona fides. We won, and won; a historical détente facilitated by tourist dollars and the shared consensus that the really nasty stuff was best left in the archives.
Yet the post-Merkel time is exposing frays of a comfortable consensus. The once-resolved questions of history have been re-opened in order to leverage political capital. In Poland, a government less dedicated to the narrative of liberal European integration has radicalized a commitment to foregrounding historical grievances. In Germany, a new generation wrestles with its historical responsibilities in a world where the old certainties are evaporating. That calm surface of reconciliation has since been disrupted, exposing the restless undertows of memory and identity that had never actually disappeared.
In a more contentious zeitgeist, a place like Galiny becomes ideologically fraught. It is a German creation, on Polish soil, a physical remnant of a past that is again bubbling up to the surface for political purposes. Is it a symbol of successful Polish restoration, or a standing hypothesis of German cultural loss? Is it a vehicle of inter-cultural dialogue, or a site of appropriation? The brilliance of our approach is its ability to reconcile (and observe) these tensions with an almost amused distance. The entire debate is a distraction for politicians, while the rest of us subscribe to pragmatic capitalism. The Polish entrepreneurs who currently own Galiny can hardly be bothered with the grand narratives of Warsaw or Berlin; they are concerned with occupancy rates and TripAdvisor reviews. The German tourist enjoys a weekend ride, not to reclaim a lost homeland, but because the exchange rate is favorable and the horses are well groomed.
The true Polish-German question, represented by locations such as Galiny, could be less about guilt, reparations, and all the rest, and more about the mundane and more potent forces of the market. History is a mere commodity in this situation, meaning is transformed and commodified from its original, molded by political winds and more importantly market demands. In the post-Merkel context where national narratives solidify, the sanitized and apolitical bubble of heritage tourism may become harder to uphold; or, more likely, it will just become more valuable as a respite from the cacophony of politics; a place where history can safely be consumed, without the bitter aftertaste of responsibility.
6. Analysis of the “Best Practices”
Pałac Galiny is more than an award-winning hotel, it is a perfect metaphor for contemporary European condition; it stands beautifully as a testament to the continent’s extraordinary ability to soothe the jagged edges of its own violent past; to dissolve sites of conflict, displacement, and ideological zeal into calm destinations for leisurely weekend getaways. From a fortress of Prussian Junkerdom to the ideological reclamation of the socialist state and now as a capitalist bastion of rustic-chic, the story is one a discontinuity whose fragments are repurposed as heritage; it is a story not of continuity, but rupture; not remembering, but erasure; not preservation, but commodification.
It’s time to debunk the romanticized narrative sold to the present-day tourist, and peeled back layers of complex and often contradictory narratives. The Eulenburgs’ 500-year legacy is not a glorious aristocratic period of opulence but as a system of feudal dominance that was violently erased in 1945. We explored the Kali pathos of the Masurian people, a culture caught between German and Polish nationalists who have been mostly erased from the territory they once defined. And we analyzed how their complex and painful past was deliberately curated and turned into a commodity that drains their history of conflict to turn it into a luxury product where authenticity is the most manufactured aspect [1].
Viewing through a critical lens unearths rich ironies. The peace and tranquility that are the selling points of Galiny, are the result of violent demographic vacuums of the 20th century. The celebration of “local tradition”, often involves folklorizing both a culture that was systematically erased. The entire project is simply a monumental project of selective amnesia; catering to a new European bourgeoisie that desires history can be consumed without being encumbered by the complexity of the moral challenges. This is not a condemnation, but rather an observation of a modern impulse; importing the past as a site of comfort, rather than challenge.
In the end, Pałac Galiny represents a triumph of the present over the past. It shows that if you have enough capital, taste, and marketing savvy, you can somehow make any history — good or bad — somehow palatable, picturesque, and profitable. It is a symbol of a New Europe that is perhaps less defined by the sober confrontation of its ghosts, as personified by figures like Angela Merkel, and more by a pragmatic – post-ideological impulse to curate them as a pleasant backdrop to the present [id:3; id:2]. The old ghosts of Prussia, the Third Reich, and the People’s Republic have not been destroyed, they have been simply renovated, redecorated, and put back on the menu. The manicured, quiet grounds of Galiny offers a calm, unsettling and perhaps inevitable endpoint to a century of European turmoil: history as a luxury good. The key success factors of the Galiny project can be summarized in the following “best practices”:
- The integrated restoration of architectural monuments (cultural heritage) and the surrounding landscape (natural heritage) was decisive. Park, ponds and river were not understood as a backdrop, but as an integral part of the historical ensemble and restored. This approach ensures the authenticity and overall value of the property.
- Instead of preserving the historic buildings in a museum way, they were intelligently repurposed for new purposes. The granary serves as a restaurant and guest house, the old forge as another guest room and the stables house the modern equestrian establishment. This adaptive reuse not only ensures the functionality and preservation of the building fabric, but also preserves the authentic character of the facility.
- Through the creation of several mutually complementary sources of income (hotel industry, gastronomy, equestrian sports, agriculture, leisure activities) a sustainable and crisis-proof business model was established. This diversification is the key to covering the high ongoing maintenance costs in the long term and reducing dependence on individual market segments.
- Galiny was saved through the commitment of private owners after the monument was abandoned to decay under state administration. This success is in sharp contrast to the fate of other important properties in the region, such as Dönhoffstädt Castle, which has been empty for decades, or Schlodien Castle, which fell under state use until the fire of 1986. The vision, the willingness to make a multi-year, complex investment, and the long-term commitment of the owners of Galiny were the driving force behind the project and prove the value of diversified sponsorship models in monument protection.
(c) RESA 10.2025
References
[1] The commodification of cultural heritage. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/document/52024
[2] [PDF] Polish-speaking Germans and the Ethnic Cleansing of Germany … http://artemis.austincollege.edu/acad/history/htooley/BlankeDone.pdf
[3] Forgotten lands? Remembering flight and expulsion in Poland’s … https://notesfrompoland.com/2020/03/20/forgotten-lands-
remembering-flight-and-expulsion-in-polands-former-german-territories/
[4] Masuria – Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masuria
[5] German-Polish cultural dialogue in former East Prussia – a success?. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2019/11/12/german-polish-cultural-
dialogue-in-former-east-prussia-a-success/
[6] Botho zu Eulenburg – Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botho_zu_Eulenburg
[7] Non-Sovereign Princely and Ducal Houses –
EI. https://www.almanachdegotha.org/id151.html
[8] [PDF] The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944 – 1950. https://prussia.online/Data/Book/a-/a-terrible-revenge/Zayas
A.-M. A Terrible Revenge (1994), OCR.pdf
[9] Ethnic Cleansing 1945 – 1948 | Waterloo Centre for German Studies.
https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-german-studies/events/ethnic-cleansing-1945-1948
[10] Flight and expulsion of Germans from Poland during and after World … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_
from_Poland_during_and_after_World_War_II
[11] What happened to the Protestant Poles in Masuria? – Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/13mn6f6/
what_happened_to_the_protestant_poles_in_masuria/
[12] Forgotten lands? Remembering flight and expulsion in Poland’s … https://notesfrompoland.com/2020/03/20/forgotten-lands-
remembering-flight-and-expulsion-in-polands-former-german-territories/
[13] Transformation of the Cultural Landscape in the Central Part … –
MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6201